Are Buxibans Covered by the Labor Standards Act?

Moderator: Eiger John

Forum rules
Taiwanease is pleased to have the legal forums moderated by individuals from the upstanding legal firm Eiger Law. While the moderators are happy to help point people in the right direction for legal assistance and to attempt to keep these forums civil and tidy, please bear in mind that an Internet forum is not the place for providing or receiving legal advice or for the creation of any attorney-client privileges or obligations. Also keep in mind that Taiwanease, the moderators and the Eiger Law firm cannot conduct comprehensive reviews of all laws or legal concepts referenced or discussed within these forums – laws and regulations are updated and amended, interpretations do change, and sometimes the legal landscape can change very fast. Taiwanease provides these legal forums for general informational purposes only. By using these legal forums, you agree that the information does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and Eiger Law or any other posters on these forums. DO NOT CONSIDER THE FORUMS TO BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR OBTAINING LEGAL ADVICE FROM A QUALIFIED LICENSED ATTORNEY.

Are Buxibans Covered by the Labor Standards Act?

Postby Eiger John » Fri Dec 30, 2011 15:33

Periodically, people are interested in the issue of whether in working for a buxiban they're now sitting out there with no labor protections whatsoever. There has been a lot of false information going about -- some of it from local Taiwan bosses who somehow hoped that they didn't have to extend Taiwan's labor protections to a bunch of foreign teachers, and some of it from vague references to the Teacher's Act and the idea that it somehow precluded any Labor Standards Act (LSA) protections. I had a couple of colleagues look into the matter extensively, and the good news for employees is that they're covered.

1. The Institutional Split: After having my Taiwan-registered attorney colleagues check the rules and then call over again to confirm with the Council of Labor Affairs and again with the Taipei City authorities, they reached the conclusion that private buxiban teachers are subject to the Labor Standards Act. There's apparently a lot of confusion on this issue because there are a lot of teacher-like jobs that fall under the Teacher's Act (教師法), which is helpfully available in English and Chinese at the MOJ website. Article 3 of the Teacher's Act perhaps leads into some of that confusion because it states:

This law applies to full-time certified teachers with monthly salaries in public and registered private schools.

Perhaps it's natural many would assume that because private buxibans also have some sort of "registration" from the government that the teachers in them would fall under this law. However, the CLA, as the competent authority, gets to make the final call on how they want to divide up the types of schools and who is covered by the Teacher's Act and who is covered by the Labor Standards Act. And they do make a split at private buxibans.

The line drawn by the CLA is that the Teacher's Act applies to all the teachers at: elementary schools, middle schools, high schools, vocational training centers, colleges/universities. For background on this, the government came up with the rule because of the difficulties of calculating teachers' working hours, overtime, etc. -- there's an economic reason for their putting many school teachers under the category in that there was some fears of overtime obligations. The private buxiban teachers, according to the CLA, are covered by the Labor Standards Act -- perhaps because the nature of their work is simply thought to be different and "more contractual" or "paid by the hour" than the sort-of extended grading, traffic-control, etc. work that a teacher might be expected to do without regard to overtime pay in one of the other sorts of schools.

2. The Job-Specific Split: Also note that the split goes by what the employee does at an institution that falls under either of the two laws. Thus, a teacher at a public or private high school, middle school, elementary school, etc. might be under the Teacher's Act, but all the non-teacher sorts in the same institution would be under the Labor Standards Act. For example, Groundskeeper Willie, were he to find a job as a groundskeeper at a Taiwanese public or private school covered under the Teacher's Act would still have his employment rights covered under the Labor Standards Act.

A Quick Sidenote: Currently, certain aspects of Taiwan's employment law fall under the Pension Act only if the employee is a Taiwanese citizen. Foreigners don't yet get to participate in the Pension Act scheme for retirement, and the stingier provisions for severance payment calculations therein also do not apply. Thus, severance for foreigners who fall under the Labor Standards Act is going to fall under those LSA rules.
User avatar
Eiger John
Taiwanease Gentry
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 15:47
Location: Taipei
Has given kudos: 5 times
Has gotten kudos: 5 times

Re: Are Buxibans Covered by the Labor Standards Act?

Postby hanzmaco » Wed Jun 07, 2017 23:43

Eiger John, amazing post. :orz: :bravo:

I have so many questions, but I'll stick to the big three:

Could you clarify three things for me please?

1) A buxiban teacher, with no marriage ARC or APRC: Is said worker entitled to severance if laid off via title 11?

I've read it's a 1/2 month pay? some say a full month pay? per year of continuous service.

2) A buxiban teacher, with no marriage ARC or APRC: Is said worker entitled to the 6 month 60% unemployment benefits if laid off under Title 11?

3) A buxiban teacher, with no marriage ARC or APRC: Is said worker entitled to the paid holiday leave, paid vacation, paid sick, paid wedding break, paid child birth, paid maternity, etc...?

trying to understand LSA vs. LPA is confusing.

What have recent results been from CLA arbitration and/or the courts?


Hanz Macomber
1st post! Welcome to Taiwanease!
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2017 05:57
Has given kudos: 0 time
Has gotten kudos: 0 time

Return to Legal Issues at Work